09:00:59 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	Hi All, Workshop starts in 1/2 hr. Please feel free to congregate in main session or any of the breakout rooms and have your morning (or afternoon) coffee.
09:23:54 From  Sek Lakhdar  to  Everyone:
	hello everyone, can i ask u please when the session will begin ? thanks
09:25:30 From  Gilles Quéméner  to  Everyone:
	Hi, normally it should start at 3:30 pm US East time
09:26:46 From  Julia Gehrlein  to  Everyone:
	There is the link to the timetable https://indico.bnl.gov/event/10495/
09:28:32 From  Sek Lakhdar  to  Everyone:
	ok thanks
10:21:12 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	I want to cast an idea out to nutau appearance in DUNE ND. It is not an official part of DUNE by any means, but there is a possibility in maybe a far future iteration of adding another near detector at a shorter baseline than the 570m currently envisioned - so you can think of a BNB type setup with detectors at distances between 360m and 570m - these are the allowable ranges.
10:21:39 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	With high energy beams peaking around 6-10 GeV
10:28:53 From  Jacobo Lopez-Pavon  to  Everyone:
	That would be very interesting. Something I didn't mention, because as far as I know there is no a detailed study yet, is that the idea of PRISM would also help reducing the shape uncertainty since it would allow measurements at different energies. And one could also have complementary experiments dedicated to measure the cross sections, something that would help a lot as you know...I do not know who ask me the question, but please contact me if you want any clarification and I can give you details about the level of systematic errors we consider for the different components in signal and background.
10:42:05 From  Peter Denton (he/him)  to  Everyone:
	Re: tau nubars, presumably there are tau nubars in the SK and IC data sets, although they certainly cannot differentiate them
10:46:39 From  Pedro Machado, Fermilab  to  Everyone:
	Both tables assume 1.2 MW x 1 year x 40 kton
10:47:42 From  Nilay Bostan (she/her/hers)  to  Everyone:
	Initial 1.2 MW beam power, upgradable to 2.4 MW.
10:47:45 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	The more interest we can garner from the community about the high energy DUNE neutrino tune, the more likely it would be considered as part of a future upgrade.
11:29:08 From  Ty DeYoung  to  Everyone:
	the newer events are much closer to the horizon, though, with higher CR backgrounds
11:29:52 From  FRANCIS L HALZEN  to  Everyone:
	Also, have a look at https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.091102
11:33:53 From  Peter Denton (he/him)  to  Everyone:
	I'll stay around if people have whitepaper questions
12:31:13 From  Peter Denton (he/him)  to  Everyone:
	Stephen we can hear you
12:31:44 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	We will type questions in chat
12:59:41 From  Xin Qian  to  Everyone:
	Hi Stephen, could you try to call in by phone for Q&A? +16468287666,,1601176746#,,,,*507241# US (New York)
13:00:13 From  Xin Qian  to  Everyone:
	can you hear us, Stephen?
13:00:37 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	Stephen, can you click next to the microphone icon on zoom - you may be able to set a different microphone and speaker
13:00:43 From  Xin Qian  to  Everyone:
	If you can call in by a cell phone, that will be great!
13:00:51 From  Xin Qian  to  Everyone:
	YEs
13:01:03 From  Peter Denton (he/him)  to  Everyone:
	We can hear you
13:01:08 From  Xin Qian  to  Everyone:
	Can you hear us, Peter is speaking
13:01:29 From  Bannanje Nitish Nayak  to  Everyone:
	I don’t think he can
13:02:59 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	Ask questions on the chat - we can email him as well
13:12:12 From  Andre de Gouvea  to  Everyone:
	For violating unitarity in the “other” way. One way to thing about it is that the elements of the mixing matrix are couplings (W ell nu). If a new interaction looks like the charged-current interaction but only impacts, for example, the tau nu_1 coupling, that entry of the mixing matrix would be different (I think this is what is being discussed now, in some way).
13:22:40 From  Stephen  to  Everyone:
	sorry, I got my computer sound to work ! apologies !
13:27:53 From  Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla  to  Everyone:
	https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.01998.pdf
13:28:24 From  Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla  to  Everyone:
	SBL+LBL fit by Forero, Giunti, Ternes, Tortola
13:29:20 From  Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla  to  Everyone:
	NOMAD, NuTeV, MINOS/MINOS+, T2K, NOvA
14:09:00 From  Jacobo Lopez-Pavon  to  Everyone:
	Thanks Sanjib! We derived bounds from neutrino oscillation experiments too. The results are in the talk, but anyway the details are here https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.08637.pdf just in case you miss the talk :) Regarding Andre comment, I agree, but one would need to check the experimental constraints. I would say that tests of electroweak universality like ratios of kaon, pion, W or lepton decays into different flavors would put a relevant constraint there.
14:46:47 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	Got it - separate VHE and UHE
14:49:56 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	Maybe a summary graph showing the range of the various experiment in energy
14:50:19 From  Mary Bishai  to  Everyone:
	On a log scale so GeV and TeV experiments can actually show up.
14:57:37 From  John Krizmanic  to  Everyone:
	sounds good!
15:04:34 From  Pedro Machado, Fermilab  to  Everyone:
	sorry