09:41:17 From Peter Denton (he/him) to Everyone:
	Please mute your mics if you are not speaking
09:56:40 From Mary Bishai to Everyone:
	There is also an irreducible nue CC background from the beam - at these energies ke3 decays contribute.
10:01:03 From Pedro Machado, Fermilab to Everyone:
	Yes, we did include the beam contamination in our backgrounds
10:04:30 From Peter Denton (he/him) to Everyone:
	Pedro (and Adam and others), it would be interesting to know what is a "best conceivable reconstruction" and on the other end how much uncertainty we get by swapping event generators
10:08:12 From John Krizmanic to Everyone:
	At 3 GeV, it looks like the coherent pi0 cross section is ~5% of that for NC deep inelastic and ~13% of NC single pion cross section, this seems to indicate that coh pi0 is a smaller part of the background, ignoring event acceptance differences.
10:25:28 From Mary Bishai to Everyone:
	My comment is that for the numu->nutau (question really for Pedro) 30% is actually QE. So for tau->e selection I am surprised the S/sqrt(B) is that good.
10:26:18 From Pedro Machado, Fermilab to Everyone:
	you mean 30% for the CP-opt or for tau-opt beam?
10:26:43 From Mary Bishai to Everyone:
	For tau-opt -this was a simple calculation using GENIE cross-sections
10:27:03 From Mary Bishai to Everyone:
	Maybe in discussion session we can dig in.
11:00:22 From Sebastian Trojanowski to Everyone:
	+
12:28:59 From D. Jason Koskinen to Everyone:
	While the signal for astrophysical neutrinos in IceCube might not so much helped in the forward region, the background for astrophysical high-energy astrophysical neutrinos can be improved by better resolution in the forward region, e.g. very low x
12:31:52 From Peter Denton (he/him) to Everyone:
	We looked at nutau UHE neutrino cross sections at 1 EeV and we are close to the region where pdf's become relevant and some NNPDF people reached out to us