SDCC Liaison Meeting

US/Eastern
3-192 (Bldg 510)

3-192

Bldg 510

Kevin Casella (SDCC), Saroj Kandasamy (BNL), Tony Wong (Brookhaven National Lab (Physics Department))
Description

Bi-weekly meetings between SDCC staff and Liaisons. Zoom connecting details are given below:

https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1616916563

By phone:       

+1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)
+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)

Meeting ID: 161 691 6563

Thursday March 18, 2021 Liaison Meeting Minutes

https://indico.bnl.gov/event/11069/

 

In addition to the uploaded presentation materials, the following QA and discussion was noted:

Facility News

  • HEPIX Spring ’21 wrapping up now, upcoming sPHENIX review and Atlas T1

Experimental Support

  • what auth for the upcoming XROOTD testbed (see Fabric below)
  • 1. Internal 2. Read privilege for all 3. R/W privilege limited for only a small set of users
  • StashCache data federation will re-visit later (no ETA yet)
  • currently only 1 collaboration writes by using x509; moving to SciTokens
  • we will integrate federation with JLAB storage

General Services

  • data transfers, new server pair: sftp.sdcc.bnl.gov for sftp replaces rftpexp servers (not for gridftp)
  • ETA for replacements is flexible maybe 1 or 2 month

Fabric

  • initial XROOTD  testbed (initially without federation) in few weeks

Tools and Services

  • 6 BNL presentations at HEPIX
  • https://indico.cern.ch/event/995485/timetable/#all.detailed
  • Liaisons reach out to Chris Lepore and Louis Pelosi for access to add/edit the SDCC website

Status of Indico Activities

  • currently operated by ITD with local accounts, allowing creation with any email address
  • we will continue to work with ITD on the next iteration of Indico and external LDAP integration
  • why add federated ID? Requests are coming for Single Sign On. Local accounts will remain
  • regarding members-only categories/events, A) add users by hand or B) LDAP integration is scaleable and long term
  • SSO reduces friction (on the order of 700 Indico accounts are a gmail email address) if we allowed certain IDPs
  • CILogon, eduroam, AD, key cloak, gmail, Facebook, GitHub, etc…
  • local accounts may be a security problem: 2 defacements ocurred where anyone could edit a public event
  • concerning past public meetings accessibility in the future, we are asking to solidify guidelines for what can and cannot be public
  • we can then evaluate past events on a case by case basis to determine how to make public again
  • possibly with a contact managers logging in and meeting the guidelines for public event or by simply enforcing a Passcode#
  • issue will be if an event is public and the parent group is private then users must have the URL can’t browse to event
  • Indico has calendar which can link the events
  • other groups in NPP not represented in this meeting
  • we are contacting groups and content managers to review our proposals before proceeding to ITD
  • we plan to gather list of all Category Managers (many) and share this proposal and invite Q/A
There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.