09:34:00 From Elke Aschenauer to Everyone: Congrats Ernst and Bernd 09:34:21 From Ernst Sichtermann (he/him) to Everyone: Thank you, Elke. 09:34:26 From Bernd Surrow to Everyone: Thank you! 10:31:06 From Elke Aschenauer to Everyone: we have 25+ subsystems depending how you count 10:46:14 From Ullrich,Thomas S to Everyone: So 25 DSSL + 25 DSSTC + 12 CAMs + … gets fairly large. If working boards become too big there is a tendency that smaller subgroups with key people start to meet simply to become more focussed and get things done reducing the efficiency of the bigger group. A moderate size board might be more efficient at the end. 10:47:58 From Zhenyu Ye to Everyone: Are L4 technical contacts (project) same as CAMS 10:48:07 From John Lajoie to Everyone: Hi Thomas - to be clear, we were envisioning the PTR as a single person, not all the CAMs. I tend to agree with you that we may start with a combined DSSL/DSSTC in one person to start, with the knowledge that this may expand as construction money starts to flow. With these considerations in mind you get closer to the scale of the existing GD/I 10:48:59 From Ullrich,Thomas S to Everyone: That sounds reasonable 10:49:09 From John Lajoie to Everyone: Zhenyu - no, CAMs must be lab employees. The L4 technical contacts is in the project plan as exactly that, the technical contact for a specific subsystem. 10:49:49 From Zhenyu Ye to Everyone: John. I see. So there is a possible overlap between DSSL/DSSTC (coll.) and L4 TC (project)? 10:50:31 From John Lajoie to Everyone: Ideally the DSSL/DSSTC is the L4 TC, that's the link. 10:50:46 From John Lajoie to Everyone: That's what we means to communicate 10:51:11 From Zhenyu Ye to Everyone: I see. That is what I thought too as the ideal case. Thanks 10:58:11 From Ullrich,Thomas S to Everyone: FYI: Control Account Manager = CAM = Person responsible for a group of project work packages tracked for cost, schedule, and technical performance. 11:00:22 From Zhenyu Ye to Everyone: This makes it clear what CAM is. Thanks Thomas. 11:00:30 From Michael Murray to Everyone: Thanks Thomas 11:01:13 From John Lajoie to Everyone: Very good point Ernst, especially the emphasis on how we organize and communicate so we can effectively bring in new collaborators 11:01:27 From Ullrich,Thomas S to Everyone: We need a comprehensive Home Page ;-) 11:01:35 From John Lajoie to Everyone: Yes, we do... 11:05:11 From John Lajoie to Everyone: Thanks - we get the message, "simplify". We'll keep trying to do this consistent with the real constraints we have to face. 11:05:47 From Christine Elizabeth Nattrass (She, Her, Hers) to Everyone: Titles and official duties are also externally recognized, which can make it more likely someone will agree to take a given role because they will get credit. Especially early career people. Yes you don't want too many cooks in the kitchen, but you also shouldn't be stingy with titles because you want people to get credit. 11:12:00 From Elke Aschenauer to Everyone: Christine, yes but work is also acknowledged, there many good examples for this of people who made major contributions have been acknowledged for it and made a excellent career 11:13:35 From Ullrich,Thomas S to Everyone: That was my question too 11:17:31 From Elke Aschenauer to Everyone: but you need this for all subsystems also the calorimeters need to work in concert 11:19:20 From John Lajoie to Everyone: True Elke but at some level it is a question of degree and where this happens. Tracking is the example that requires this the most to my mind, PID next, etc. 11:27:28 From Wlodek Guryn to John Lajoie(Direct Message): As a follow up, I believe that it goes without saying that you are also checking other commitments people have, like STAR, sPHENIX, ALICE to name a few. 11:28:39 From John Lajoie to Wlodek Guryn(Direct Message): Oh yes and that is a huge problem - many people are heavily committed to other project 11:32:04 From John Arrington to Everyone: some systems certainly require a change well before we have the TDR, but others may not have the same urgency