Focus on:
All days
26 Jun 2020
27 Jun 2020
28 Jun 2020
29 Jun 2020
30 Jun 2020
1 Jul 2020
Indico style
Indico style - inline minutes
Indico style - numbered
Indico style - numbered + minutes
Indico Weeks View
Back to Conference View
Choose Timezone
Use the event/category timezone
Specify a timezone
Africa/Abidjan
Africa/Accra
Africa/Addis_Ababa
Africa/Algiers
Africa/Asmara
Africa/Bamako
Africa/Bangui
Africa/Banjul
Africa/Bissau
Africa/Blantyre
Africa/Brazzaville
Africa/Bujumbura
Africa/Cairo
Africa/Casablanca
Africa/Ceuta
Africa/Conakry
Africa/Dakar
Africa/Dar_es_Salaam
Africa/Djibouti
Africa/Douala
Africa/El_Aaiun
Africa/Freetown
Africa/Gaborone
Africa/Harare
Africa/Johannesburg
Africa/Juba
Africa/Kampala
Africa/Khartoum
Africa/Kigali
Africa/Kinshasa
Africa/Lagos
Africa/Libreville
Africa/Lome
Africa/Luanda
Africa/Lubumbashi
Africa/Lusaka
Africa/Malabo
Africa/Maputo
Africa/Maseru
Africa/Mbabane
Africa/Mogadishu
Africa/Monrovia
Africa/Nairobi
Africa/Ndjamena
Africa/Niamey
Africa/Nouakchott
Africa/Ouagadougou
Africa/Porto-Novo
Africa/Sao_Tome
Africa/Tripoli
Africa/Tunis
Africa/Windhoek
America/Adak
America/Anchorage
America/Anguilla
America/Antigua
America/Araguaina
America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires
America/Argentina/Catamarca
America/Argentina/Cordoba
America/Argentina/Jujuy
America/Argentina/La_Rioja
America/Argentina/Mendoza
America/Argentina/Rio_Gallegos
America/Argentina/Salta
America/Argentina/San_Juan
America/Argentina/San_Luis
America/Argentina/Tucuman
America/Argentina/Ushuaia
America/Aruba
America/Asuncion
America/Atikokan
America/Bahia
America/Bahia_Banderas
America/Barbados
America/Belem
America/Belize
America/Blanc-Sablon
America/Boa_Vista
America/Bogota
America/Boise
America/Cambridge_Bay
America/Campo_Grande
America/Cancun
America/Caracas
America/Cayenne
America/Cayman
America/Chicago
America/Chihuahua
America/Costa_Rica
America/Creston
America/Cuiaba
America/Curacao
America/Danmarkshavn
America/Dawson
America/Dawson_Creek
America/Denver
America/Detroit
America/Dominica
America/Edmonton
America/Eirunepe
America/El_Salvador
America/Fort_Nelson
America/Fortaleza
America/Glace_Bay
America/Goose_Bay
America/Grand_Turk
America/Grenada
America/Guadeloupe
America/Guatemala
America/Guayaquil
America/Guyana
America/Halifax
America/Havana
America/Hermosillo
America/Indiana/Indianapolis
America/Indiana/Knox
America/Indiana/Marengo
America/Indiana/Petersburg
America/Indiana/Tell_City
America/Indiana/Vevay
America/Indiana/Vincennes
America/Indiana/Winamac
America/Inuvik
America/Iqaluit
America/Jamaica
America/Juneau
America/Kentucky/Louisville
America/Kentucky/Monticello
America/Kralendijk
America/La_Paz
America/Lima
America/Los_Angeles
America/Lower_Princes
America/Maceio
America/Managua
America/Manaus
America/Marigot
America/Martinique
America/Matamoros
America/Mazatlan
America/Menominee
America/Merida
America/Metlakatla
America/Mexico_City
America/Miquelon
America/Moncton
America/Monterrey
America/Montevideo
America/Montserrat
America/Nassau
America/New_York
America/Nipigon
America/Nome
America/Noronha
America/North_Dakota/Beulah
America/North_Dakota/Center
America/North_Dakota/New_Salem
America/Nuuk
America/Ojinaga
America/Panama
America/Pangnirtung
America/Paramaribo
America/Phoenix
America/Port-au-Prince
America/Port_of_Spain
America/Porto_Velho
America/Puerto_Rico
America/Punta_Arenas
America/Rainy_River
America/Rankin_Inlet
America/Recife
America/Regina
America/Resolute
America/Rio_Branco
America/Santarem
America/Santiago
America/Santo_Domingo
America/Sao_Paulo
America/Scoresbysund
America/Sitka
America/St_Barthelemy
America/St_Johns
America/St_Kitts
America/St_Lucia
America/St_Thomas
America/St_Vincent
America/Swift_Current
America/Tegucigalpa
America/Thule
America/Thunder_Bay
America/Tijuana
America/Toronto
America/Tortola
America/Vancouver
America/Whitehorse
America/Winnipeg
America/Yakutat
America/Yellowknife
Antarctica/Casey
Antarctica/Davis
Antarctica/DumontDUrville
Antarctica/Macquarie
Antarctica/Mawson
Antarctica/McMurdo
Antarctica/Palmer
Antarctica/Rothera
Antarctica/Syowa
Antarctica/Troll
Antarctica/Vostok
Arctic/Longyearbyen
Asia/Aden
Asia/Almaty
Asia/Amman
Asia/Anadyr
Asia/Aqtau
Asia/Aqtobe
Asia/Ashgabat
Asia/Atyrau
Asia/Baghdad
Asia/Bahrain
Asia/Baku
Asia/Bangkok
Asia/Barnaul
Asia/Beirut
Asia/Bishkek
Asia/Brunei
Asia/Chita
Asia/Choibalsan
Asia/Colombo
Asia/Damascus
Asia/Dhaka
Asia/Dili
Asia/Dubai
Asia/Dushanbe
Asia/Famagusta
Asia/Gaza
Asia/Hebron
Asia/Ho_Chi_Minh
Asia/Hong_Kong
Asia/Hovd
Asia/Irkutsk
Asia/Jakarta
Asia/Jayapura
Asia/Jerusalem
Asia/Kabul
Asia/Kamchatka
Asia/Karachi
Asia/Kathmandu
Asia/Khandyga
Asia/Kolkata
Asia/Krasnoyarsk
Asia/Kuala_Lumpur
Asia/Kuching
Asia/Kuwait
Asia/Macau
Asia/Magadan
Asia/Makassar
Asia/Manila
Asia/Muscat
Asia/Nicosia
Asia/Novokuznetsk
Asia/Novosibirsk
Asia/Omsk
Asia/Oral
Asia/Phnom_Penh
Asia/Pontianak
Asia/Pyongyang
Asia/Qatar
Asia/Qostanay
Asia/Qyzylorda
Asia/Riyadh
Asia/Sakhalin
Asia/Samarkand
Asia/Seoul
Asia/Shanghai
Asia/Singapore
Asia/Srednekolymsk
Asia/Taipei
Asia/Tashkent
Asia/Tbilisi
Asia/Tehran
Asia/Thimphu
Asia/Tokyo
Asia/Tomsk
Asia/Ulaanbaatar
Asia/Urumqi
Asia/Ust-Nera
Asia/Vientiane
Asia/Vladivostok
Asia/Yakutsk
Asia/Yangon
Asia/Yekaterinburg
Asia/Yerevan
Atlantic/Azores
Atlantic/Bermuda
Atlantic/Canary
Atlantic/Cape_Verde
Atlantic/Faroe
Atlantic/Madeira
Atlantic/Reykjavik
Atlantic/South_Georgia
Atlantic/St_Helena
Atlantic/Stanley
Australia/Adelaide
Australia/Brisbane
Australia/Broken_Hill
Australia/Darwin
Australia/Eucla
Australia/Hobart
Australia/Lindeman
Australia/Lord_Howe
Australia/Melbourne
Australia/Perth
Australia/Sydney
Canada/Atlantic
Canada/Central
Canada/Eastern
Canada/Mountain
Canada/Newfoundland
Canada/Pacific
Europe/Amsterdam
Europe/Andorra
Europe/Astrakhan
Europe/Athens
Europe/Belgrade
Europe/Berlin
Europe/Bratislava
Europe/Brussels
Europe/Bucharest
Europe/Budapest
Europe/Busingen
Europe/Chisinau
Europe/Copenhagen
Europe/Dublin
Europe/Gibraltar
Europe/Guernsey
Europe/Helsinki
Europe/Isle_of_Man
Europe/Istanbul
Europe/Jersey
Europe/Kaliningrad
Europe/Kiev
Europe/Kirov
Europe/Lisbon
Europe/Ljubljana
Europe/London
Europe/Luxembourg
Europe/Madrid
Europe/Malta
Europe/Mariehamn
Europe/Minsk
Europe/Monaco
Europe/Moscow
Europe/Oslo
Europe/Paris
Europe/Podgorica
Europe/Prague
Europe/Riga
Europe/Rome
Europe/Samara
Europe/San_Marino
Europe/Sarajevo
Europe/Saratov
Europe/Simferopol
Europe/Skopje
Europe/Sofia
Europe/Stockholm
Europe/Tallinn
Europe/Tirane
Europe/Ulyanovsk
Europe/Uzhgorod
Europe/Vaduz
Europe/Vatican
Europe/Vienna
Europe/Vilnius
Europe/Volgograd
Europe/Warsaw
Europe/Zagreb
Europe/Zaporozhye
Europe/Zurich
GMT
Indian/Antananarivo
Indian/Chagos
Indian/Christmas
Indian/Cocos
Indian/Comoro
Indian/Kerguelen
Indian/Mahe
Indian/Maldives
Indian/Mauritius
Indian/Mayotte
Indian/Reunion
Pacific/Apia
Pacific/Auckland
Pacific/Bougainville
Pacific/Chatham
Pacific/Chuuk
Pacific/Easter
Pacific/Efate
Pacific/Fakaofo
Pacific/Fiji
Pacific/Funafuti
Pacific/Galapagos
Pacific/Gambier
Pacific/Guadalcanal
Pacific/Guam
Pacific/Honolulu
Pacific/Kanton
Pacific/Kiritimati
Pacific/Kosrae
Pacific/Kwajalein
Pacific/Majuro
Pacific/Marquesas
Pacific/Midway
Pacific/Nauru
Pacific/Niue
Pacific/Norfolk
Pacific/Noumea
Pacific/Pago_Pago
Pacific/Palau
Pacific/Pitcairn
Pacific/Pohnpei
Pacific/Port_Moresby
Pacific/Rarotonga
Pacific/Saipan
Pacific/Tahiti
Pacific/Tarawa
Pacific/Tongatapu
Pacific/Wake
Pacific/Wallis
US/Alaska
US/Arizona
US/Central
US/Eastern
US/Hawaii
US/Mountain
US/Pacific
UTC
Save
US/Eastern
English (United Kingdom)
English (United Kingdom)
English (United States)
Español (España)
Français (France)
Polski (Polska)
Português (Brasil)
Türkçe (Türkiye)
Монгол (Монгол)
Українська (Україна)
中文 (中国)
Login
Beam Polarization and Polarimetry at EIC
from
Friday, 26 June 2020 (08:00)
to
Wednesday, 1 July 2020 (19:00)
Monday, 22 June 2020
Tuesday, 23 June 2020
Wednesday, 24 June 2020
Thursday, 25 June 2020
Friday, 26 June 2020
08:00
Welcome
-
Abhay Deshpande
(Stony Brook University)
Welcome
Abhay Deshpande
(Stony Brook University)
08:00 - 08:15
08:15
Physics drivers for polarized beam
-
Andrea Bressan
Physics drivers for polarized beam
Andrea Bressan
08:15 - 08:45
08:45
EIC accelerator design
-
Christoph Montag
(BNL)
Christoph Montag
(BNL)
EIC accelerator design
Christoph Montag
(BNL)
Christoph Montag
(BNL)
08:45 - 09:15
09:15
Physics with polarized positrons
-
Eric Voutier
Physics with polarized positrons
Eric Voutier
09:15 - 09:45
09:45
Possibilities of polarized positrons
-
Joe Grames
(Jefferson Lab)
Possibilities of polarized positrons
Joe Grames
(Jefferson Lab)
09:45 - 10:15
10:15
Streching break
Streching break
10:15 - 10:35
10:35
What is planned at ILC
-
Jenny List
(DESY)
What is planned at ILC
Jenny List
(DESY)
10:35 - 11:05
11:05
Polarization Upgrade and Polarimetry at the SuperKEKB Facility
-
Wouter Deconinck
Polarization Upgrade and Polarimetry at the SuperKEKB Facility
Wouter Deconinck
11:05 - 11:35
SuperKEKB is an unpolarized electron-positron collider designed for a luminosity of 8 × 10<sup>35</sup> cm<sup>−2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup> with a 4 GeV positron beam (Low Energy Ring - LER) and 7 GeV electron beam (High Energy Ring - HER). To enable precision measurements of the weak neutral couplings in the Belle II experiment, an upgrade is under consideration to polarize the HER to 70% by injecting polarized electrons (due to the short beam lifetime, Sokolov-Ternov self-polarization is impractical). In most areas of the HER the spin will be oriented transversely, but around the interaction region spin rotators will align the spin longitudinally. In addition to Mott polarimetry in the injector, we will measure the stored beam polarization to a precision of 0.5% with a combination of Compton polarimetry and measurements of the forward-backward asymmetries in e<sup>+</sup>e<sup>−</sup> → τ<sup>+</sup>τ<sup>−</sup> events at the interaction point. This will allow measurements of sin<sup>2</sup> θ<sub>W</sub><sup>eff</sup> with a combined uncertainty comparable to the Z<sup>0</sup> world average measured uncertainty of ±0.00016 from LEP and SLD, but made at a significantly lower energy scale of 10.58 GeV.
11:35
Transparent Spin Mode for Polarized Beams in the EIC
-
Yuri Filatov
(MIPT)
Transparent Spin Mode for Polarized Beams in the EIC
Yuri Filatov
(MIPT)
11:35 - 12:05
The transparent spin (TS) technique has been proposed as an efficient high-flexible method to control the beam polarization, from acceleration to long-term maintenance and real-time spin manipulation during an experimental run of a collider. Attractiveness of the TS method is that it allows for manipulation of the polarization using small insertions of weak magnetic fields (stationary or quasi-static) not affecting the orbital dynamics. The TS mode allows one to do frequent coherent spin flips of the beam to reduce experiment’s systematic errors, and carry out ultrahigh precision experiments. The TS mode may allow one to significantly expand the capabilities of polarized beam experiments at the RHIC-based EIC at BNL in the US. It makes it possible to manipulate the polarizations of proton and 3He beams during experiments in the collider’s entire energy range. The TS mode is also considered for spin control of polarized deuterons near the energies corresponding to integer spin resonances. The talk presents schemes for proton and deuteron polarization control using the TS mode in RHIC.
12:05
Lunch
Lunch
12:05 - 13:00
13:00
Physics with polarized Deuterons
-
Ellie Long
(University of New Hempshire)
Physics with polarized Deuterons
Ellie Long
(University of New Hempshire)
13:00 - 13:30
13:30
Feasibility of Polarized Deuteron Beam
-
Haixin Huang
(Brookhaven National Lab)
Feasibility of Polarized Deuteron Beam
Haixin Huang
(Brookhaven National Lab)
13:30 - 14:00
14:00
Polarised beams in particle colliders
-
Mei Bai
Mei Bai
(BNL)
Polarised beams in particle colliders
Mei Bai
Mei Bai
(BNL)
14:00 - 14:30
14:30
Discussion
Discussion
14:30 - 15:30
Saturday, 27 June 2020
Sunday, 28 June 2020
Monday, 29 June 2020
08:00
Experience from RHIC leading the way to EIC
-
William Schmidke
(BNL)
Experience from RHIC leading the way to EIC
William Schmidke
(BNL)
08:00 - 08:30
08:30
Experience from COSY
-
Frank Rathmann
(Forschungszentrum Jülich)
Experience from COSY
Frank Rathmann
(Forschungszentrum Jülich)
08:30 - 09:00
09:00
Elastic e-D scattering for deuteron polarimetry
-
Barak Schmookler
(Stony Brook University)
Elastic e-D scattering for deuteron polarimetry
Barak Schmookler
(Stony Brook University)
09:00 - 09:30
09:30
He-3 polarimetry / polarised targets
-
Gordon Cates
(University of Virginia)
He-3 polarimetry / polarised targets
Gordon Cates
(University of Virginia)
09:30 - 10:00
10:00
Streching break
Streching break
10:00 - 10:30
10:30
Absolute polarization measurement of the 200 MeV proton beam at Linac.
-
Andrei Poblaguev
(BNL)
Absolute polarization measurement of the 200 MeV proton beam at Linac.
Andrei Poblaguev
(BNL)
10:30 - 11:00
The $200\,\mathrm{MeV}$ polarimeter at Linac is based on the elastic proton-carbon scattering at $16.2^\circ$ angle, where the analyzing power reaches almost absolute maximum which was experimentally established with high accuracy of $99.35\pm0.15\,\%$ . The elastically and inelastically scattered protons are clearly separated by the difference in the propagation through adjustable thickness copper absorber and energy deposition of the stopped protons in the detectors. The elastic scattering polarimeter used for calibration of a high rate inclusive $12^\circ$ polarimer for the on-line polarization tuning and monitoring. In Run 2017 a new WFD based DAQ was developed for better elastic scattering isolation. Preliminary results showed, that experimental uncertainties in the absolute polarization measurements are expected to be $σ_P^\mathrm{syst}<0.6\,\%$ and $σ_P^\mathrm{stat}\sim0.4\,\%/\mathrm{hour}$. We plan further DAQ and detectors improvements in the next polarized proton Run.
11:00
Development of absolute polarimeter for the low energy $\bf^3\mathrm{He}^{++}$ ion beam
-
Grigor Atoian
(Brookhaven National Lab)
Development of absolute polarimeter for the low energy $\bf^3\mathrm{He}^{++}$ ion beam
Grigor Atoian
(Brookhaven National Lab)
11:00 - 11:30
For the Electron-Ion Collider, a polarized ${}^3\mathrm{He}^{++}$ ion source is being constructed at the Electron Beam Ionization Source (EBIS) of the Brookhaven National Laboratory. For precision determination of the ${}^3\mathrm{He}$ polarization, the ${}^3\mathrm{He}$ beam, after acceleration to 6 MeV at EBIS, will be elastically scattered off a gas ${}^4\mathrm{He}$ target. For such a scattering, the analyzing power $A_\mathrm{N}(E_\mathrm{beam},\theta_\mathrm{CM})$ can reach absolute, $100\%$, maximum at some points in the beam energy / center of mass scattering angle plane [1]. Several such points were found in Refs. [2, 3] including $(E_\mathrm{beam}=5.3\,\mathrm{MeV}, \theta_\mathrm{CM}=91^\circ)$. The vertically polarized $6\,\mathrm{MeV}$ ${}^3\mathrm{He}^{++}$ ion beam will enter, through a thin window (to minimize the energy loss of the beam), to the scattering chamber filled with ${}^4\mathrm{He}$ gas at a pressure of $\sim5\,\mathrm{Torr}$. Two left-right symmetric Si strip detectors (with vertically oriented strips) will be used to detect both scattered $^3\mathrm{He}$ and recoil $^4\mathrm{He}$ particles in every event. Good energy and time resolution of the detectors will allow us to recognize $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^4\mathrm{He}$ signals and to eliminate background events. A spin rotator will provide the beam spin-flip to suppress the acceptance and intensity related systematic errors. For the polarimeter calibration, we plan to scan the $^3\mathrm{He}$ energy (by variation the entrance window thickness) and to measure the spin-correlated asymmetry dependence on scattering angle $\theta_\mathrm{CM}$. Analyzing power $A_\mathrm{N}=100\%$ can be attributed to the absolute maximum found in these measurements. [1] G. Plattner et al., “Absolute calibration of spin – 1/2 polarization”, Phys. Lett. B **36**, 211 (1971) [2] D.M. Hardy et al., “Polarization in $^3\mathrm{He}$ + $^4\mathrm{He}$ elastic scattering”, Phys. Lett. B **31**, 355 (1970) [3] W.R. Boykin, S.D. Baker, D.M. Hardy, “Scattering of $^3\mathrm{He}$ and $^4\mathrm{He}$ from polarized $^3\mathrm{He}$ between 4 and 10 MeV”, Nucl. Phys. A **195**, 241 (1972)
11:30
Can absolute polarization of the $^3\mathrm{He}$ beams at EIC be precisely measured by HJET?
-
Andrei Poblaguev
(BNL)
Can absolute polarization of the $^3\mathrm{He}$ beams at EIC be precisely measured by HJET?
Andrei Poblaguev
(BNL)
11:30 - 12:00
A possibility to precisely measure absolute vertical polarization of the EIC ${}^3\mathrm{He}$ beams using the polarized hydrogen gas jet target (HJET) is discussed. By concurrent measurement of $a_h$ and $a_p$, the beam $h^\uparrow p$ and jet $p^\uparrow h$ spin asymmetries for the detected recoil protons, the He3 beam polarization can be approximated by $P_\mathrm{beam}=P_\mathrm{jet}\times a_h\kappa_p/a_p\kappa_h$, where $\kappa_p=1.793$ and $\kappa_h = -1.398$ are derived from the magnetic moments $\mu_p$ and $\mu_h$, and $P_\mathrm{jet}\approx0.957$ is the jet polarization determined by a conventional Breit-Rabi polarimeter. The result does not depend on the actual parameters of $hp$ scattering: total cross-section $\sigma_\mathrm{tot}$, forward real-to-imaginary ratio $\rho$, or Coulomb phase $\delta_C$. Corrections of a few percent to the value of $P_\mathrm{beam}$ due to the term $\sim m^2/s$ in the electromagnetic spin-flip amplitude and due to hadronic spin-flip amplitudes $r_5^{hp}$ and $r_5^{ph}$ are well determined. Since the ${}^3\mathrm{He}$ ground state is mostly fully space-symmetric $S$ state, the $hp$ spin-flip amplitudes can be readily related with sufficient accuracy, $r_p^{hp}=r_5^{pp}/3$ and $r_5^{ph}=r_5^{pp}$, to the amplitude measured in elastic $pp$ scattering. Considering the experimental uncertainty in the value of $r_5^{pp}$ as well as the uncertainties in the measurement of $a_h/a_p$, we can expect $\sigma_P^\mathrm{syst}\leq0.9\,\%$ accuracy for the absolute ${}^3\mathrm{He}$ beam polarization at EIC. Since only the recoil proton is detected in HJET measurements, the acquired data may be contaminated by inelastic (${}^3\mathrm{He}$ break-up) events. However, since only low energy protons in the small solid angle at 90 degree are counted, the inelastic component is strongly suppressed. Analyzing Run 16 data with a deuteron beam, we found that data contamination by the break-up events should not exceed a few percent. In addition, the inelastic corrections are significantly canceled in the $a_h/a_p$ ratio. Thus, the anticipated alteration of the measured $P_\mathrm{beam}$ due to ${}^3\mathrm{He}$ break-up can be neglected.
12:00
Lunch
Lunch
12:00 - 13:00
13:00
Light Ion Polarimetry at the EIC
-
Ana Sofia Nunes
(Brookhaven National Laboratory)
Light Ion Polarimetry at the EIC
Ana Sofia Nunes
(Brookhaven National Laboratory)
13:00 - 13:15
Polarization of high energy proton beams has successfully been measured at RHIC with elastic proton-proton and proton-Carbon scattering. The analyzing power is not known from first principles and has to be measured. The observed background to the elastic scattering events needs to be much better understood because of the much shorter bunch spacing at EIC. This background can cause a simple dilution of the elastic scattering events or it can bias the polarization. It will therefore be very informative to use the existing RHIC facilities in the next few years to assess as much information as possible for light ion polarimetry, namely event rates, both for elastic scattering and for backgrounds (including breakup), and analyzing powers. A programme of simulations was initiated to prepare the mentioned measurements and to understand the EIC conditions. A first step is to simulate the proton-proton interactions at RHIC, for which the event generator Pythia6 is being used. Dpmjet3 is the event generator of choice to, first, reproduce Pythia6 results and, afterwards, to simulate interactions with light ions, as it is prepared to describe the interactions at low momentum transfer relevant for the polarimeters. The energy loss of the particles in the silicon sensors is to be described by Geant4. Simulation results will be presented and discussed.
13:15
Light ion polarimetry at high energy
-
Nigel Buttimore
(Trinity College Dublin)
Light ion polarimetry at high energy
Nigel Buttimore
(Trinity College Dublin)
13:15 - 13:45
Peripheral scattering of polarized proton, deuteron, and Helium-3 ions on light nuclei, and other nuclei, provides a method of evaluating the level of polarization of high energy beams. The asymmetry of recoils resulting from elastic collision can indicate the analyzing power required for polarimetry provided a number of quantities are known with sufficient accuracy. Among the items needed is the Coulomb phase, $\delta_C \propto ZZ'\alpha$, encoding second order electromagnetic corrections to the scattering of charge $Z$ ions on nuclei of charge $Z'$. This phase varies from about 7% to 12% as $ZZ'$ ranges from 4 (3He-3He) to 12 (3He-12C) in the interference region. The behavior of the analyzing power as a function of momentum transfer is discussed, avoiding the assumption that $\delta_C$ is small as is common for the case of polarized proton proton scattering. An expression for the momentum transfer at which the size of the analyzing power reaches a maximum is presented that involves electromagnetic form factors, the hadronic slope of the near forward differential cross section, and to first order, a contribution from the single helicity-flip hadronic amplitude normalized to the imaginary non-flip hadronic amplitude. The extreme value of the analyzing power is also noted, a value that depends upon the total cross section of the reaction and $\rho$, the real to imaginary ratio of the spin-averaged hadronic amplitude.
13:45
Polarimetry based on forward neutrons in pA scattering
-
William Schmidke
(BNL)
Polarimetry based on forward neutrons in pA scattering
William Schmidke
(BNL)
13:45 - 14:00
The PHENIX collaboration has observed a large azimuthal asymmetry of forward neutrons produced in polarized pA collisions. The data are well described by a model incorporating photons from the high Z nucleus photoproducing low mass baryonic states from the polarized proton. The model is based on well known electromagnetic effects and well measured photoproduction processes. We will discuss possible application of this process to polarimetry of high energy polarized proton beams. A simple target/detector system will be described, based on standard detector technology. Rate estimates will be presented, based on feasible targets and realized RHIC and planned EIC polarized proton beams. Possible tests at RHIC runs in the next few years will be outlined.
14:00
Improvement of proton polarization for EIC
-
Vincent Schoefer
(CAD)
Improvement of proton polarization for EIC
Vincent Schoefer
(CAD)
14:00 - 14:30
14:30
Polarized He3 in EIC
-
francois meot
(bnl)
Polarized He3 in EIC
francois meot
(bnl)
14:30 - 15:00
15:00
Bmad and PTC spin simulations
-
David Sagan
(Cornell)
Bmad and PTC spin simulations
David Sagan
(Cornell)
15:00 - 15:30
15:30
Discussion
Discussion
15:30 - 16:30
Tuesday, 30 June 2020
Wednesday, 1 July 2020
08:00
HERA Polarimetry (FP cavity in collider)
-
Stefan Schmitt
(DESY)
HERA Polarimetry (FP cavity in collider)
Stefan Schmitt
(DESY)
08:00 - 08:30
08:30
Lepton polarimetry at JLab
-
Kent Paschke
(University of Virginia)
Lepton polarimetry at JLab
Kent Paschke
(University of Virginia)
08:30 - 09:00
09:00
Compton Polarimeter laser options
-
Ciprian Gal
(Stony Brook University)
Compton Polarimeter laser options
Ciprian Gal
(Stony Brook University)
09:00 - 09:30
09:30
Precision Mott Polarimetry
-
Tim Gay
(University of Nebraska)
Precision Mott Polarimetry
Tim Gay
(University of Nebraska)
09:30 - 09:45
High-Precision 5 MeV Mott Polarimetry at CEBAF+ T.J.Gay* University of Nebraska - Lincoln We report on the design and performance of a Mott polarimeter optimized for a nominal 5-MeV electron beam from the CEBAF injector. The rf time structure of this beam allows the use of time-of-flight in the electron detection, making it possible to isolate those detected electrons that originate from the scattering foil, and resulting in measured scattering asymmetries which are exceptionally stable over a broad range of beam conditions, beam currents, and target foil thicknesses. In two separate series of measurements from two different photocathode electron sources, we measured the Mott scattering asymmetries produced by an approximately 86% transversely polarized electron beam incident on ten Au foils with nominal thicknesses between 50 and 1000 nm. The statistical uncertainty of the measured asymmetry from each foil is below 0.25%. Within this statistical precision, the measured asymmetry was unaffected by ±1-mm shifts in the beam position on the target, and by beam current changes and dead-time effects over a wide range of beam currents. The overall uncertainty of our beam polarization measurement, arising from the uncertainty in the value of the scattering asymmetry at zero foil thickness as determined from our fits to the measured asymmetries versus scattering foil thicknesses, the estimated systematic effects, and the (dominant) uncertainty from the calculation of the theoretical Sherman function, is 0.61%. GEANT4 calculations give results for the asymmetry versus foil thickness in good agreement with our measurements. Future measurements at different beam energies and with target foils of different atomic numbers will seek to bound uncertainties from small effects such as radiative corrections to the calculation of the polarimeter analyzing power. A simultaneous high-precision measurement of the beam polarization with a different polarimeter, AESOP (Accurate Electron Spin Optical Polarimeter), under development at the University of Nebraska, is expected to allow a high-precision comparison of our measured asymmetries with theoretical calculations of the Mott analyzing power. Finally, the improved precision of the current Mott polarimeter along with similar improvements to other Jefferson Lab GeV-energy polarimeters warrants another “Spin Dance” precision comparison of all of these polarimeters. *This work was done in collaboration with J. M. Grames1, C. K. Sinclair1, M. Poelker1, X. Roca-Maza2, M. Stutzman1, R. Sulieman1, Md. A. Mamun1,3, M. McHugh4, D. Moser1, J. Hansknecht1, B. Moffit1, and Keith Foreman5. 1JLab 2UDS-Milano 3ODU 4GWU and 5UNL +Work supported in part by NSF Grants No. PHY-1505794, 1632778, and 1806771 (TJG, KF), Department of Energy Grant DE-AC05-84ER40150, and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation program 1508 under Grant No. 654002 (XR-M).
09:45
Streching break
Streching break
09:45 - 10:15
10:15
Low-energy polarimetry
-
Kurt Aulenbacher
(Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz)
Low-energy polarimetry
Kurt Aulenbacher
(Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz)
10:15 - 10:45
10:45
Spin rotator design and spin matching
-
Vadim Ptitsyn
(C-AD, BNL)
Spin rotator design and spin matching
Vadim Ptitsyn
(C-AD, BNL)
10:45 - 11:15
11:15
Compact spin rotator design
-
Fanglei Lin
(Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility)
Compact spin rotator design
Fanglei Lin
(Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility)
11:15 - 11:45
11:45
EIC electron polarization studies
-
Eliana Gianfelice
(FNAL)
EIC electron polarization studies
Eliana Gianfelice
(FNAL)
11:45 - 12:15
12:15
Lunch
Lunch
12:15 - 13:15
13:15
Acceleration of electrons in RCS
-
Vahid Ranjbar
(BNL)
Acceleration of electrons in RCS
Vahid Ranjbar
(BNL)
13:15 - 13:45
13:45
Fast spin tracking and spin matching with stochastic one turn maps
-
Oleksii Beznosov
(University of New Mexico)
Fast spin tracking and spin matching with stochastic one turn maps
Oleksii Beznosov
(University of New Mexico)
13:45 - 14:15
14:15
IR related effects
-
Vasiliy Morozov
(Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility)
IR related effects
Vasiliy Morozov
(Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility)
14:15 - 14:45
14:45
Discussion
Discussion
14:45 - 15:45